Why Are We So Afraid to Let Children Quit?

When a child wants to stop something they once enjoyed, we often worry that letting them walk away will teach them to give up. But what if quitting tells us something else?

A child wants to play an instrument, join a team, take a class, learn a language, or try a new activity. They begin enthusiastically. Maybe they even seem to have a natural ability for it.

And then they want to stop.

For many parents, this is surprisingly difficult territory. It isn't necessarily the activity itself that feels important. It's everything we think might be at stake if we let them walk away.

Will they learn to give up whenever something becomes difficult? What about perseverance? What if they're quitting because they're frustrated or afraid, and would love it if they could only get through this part? What if they have a real talent and don't yet understand what they could do with it?

The decision can begin to feel much bigger than whether a child continues with piano or soccer.

We are no longer thinking only about what they want to do now. We are thinking about the person they are becoming.

Prefer listening? This article was inspired by an episode of Radical Learning Talks about children quitting, the fears that can surface for parents, and what changes when we become curious about why a child wants to stop.

Listen to the episode here, or keep reading.

In this episode, we explore:

  • Why children quitting can create so much anxiety for parents

  • The fear that letting a child stop will teach them to give up when things get hard

  • Why children may move intensely in and out of interests

  • The difference between struggling with something and no longer wanting to do it

  • What children's desire to quit can tell us about their experience

  • How parents' needs, money, and commitments to other people complicate the decision

  • What perseverance might look like when it isn't imposed by an adult

When Quitting Starts to Mean Something Bigger

Children stop doing things all the time.

An interest that consumed them for months disappears almost overnight. The instrument they begged for sits untouched. They decide they don't want to return to the class they couldn't wait to start. Something that seemed important suddenly isn't.

There is nothing particularly unusual about this. Interests change throughout our lives. Adults abandon books halfway through, stop hobbies, change exercise routines, leave courses, discover new interests and return years later to things they once put aside. We don't expect every curiosity to become a commitment.

With children, though, stopping can acquire another meaning.

We worry about what they are learning from the act of quitting. Continuing becomes associated with perseverance, discipline, resilience, and the ability to tolerate frustration. Stopping can begin to look like evidence that a child is avoiding difficulty — or that we are failing to help them develop the capacity to move through it.

And so an activity that may have begun simply because a child was curious about it becomes connected to something much larger: our ideas about what they will need in order to cope with life.

That changes the question.

Instead of asking what has changed for this child in relation to this particular activity, we can find ourselves trying to determine whether allowing them to stop will shape the kind of person they become.

The future enters the room.

And once it does, quitting becomes much harder to see as an ordinary part of exploring what we like, what we don't, what fits for a while, and what we're ready to leave behind.

The Rush to Find Their Thing

There is a particular urgency around children's interests that doesn't seem to exist in quite the same way for adults.

When a child shows an aptitude for music, adults may begin thinking about what could happen if they keep playing. A child who loves drawing might have artistic talent. The kid who is fast on the soccer field could become a serious athlete. An intense interest in computers, animals, dance, chess, or mathematics can quickly become something to develop.

It isn't strange that we do this. When we see something light up in a child, we want to support it. We want to give them opportunities we may not have had ourselves. And sometimes we can see possibilities they cannot yet see.

But possibility can quickly become expectation.

An interest stops being something a child is experiencing and begins to look like the beginning of a path. Once we can see that path, walking away from it feels different. They aren't only stopping piano. They might be giving up the chance to become a musician. They aren't simply tired of gymnastics. They may be abandoning something they could have been exceptional at.

Childhood makes these possibilities feel unusually time-sensitive. There are things we associate with starting young. We hear about athletes who began training at five and musicians who had already practiced for thousands of hours before adolescence. Even when we have no particular ambition for our children to become elite performers, those stories reinforce the sense that some opportunities have windows, and that a child may not understand what they are losing by allowing one to close.

This can make it difficult to distinguish between a child's potential and a child's desire.

Being good at something doesn't mean wanting to build a life around it. Enjoying something for six months doesn't create an obligation to enjoy it for six years. And an experience doesn't have to lead anywhere in order to have been worthwhile.

Children are also discovering themselves partly by trying things and finding out that they don't want them.

That process can look inefficient from the outside. There may be abandoned instruments, half-developed skills, short-lived fascinations and activities that seemed enormously important until they weren't. But knowing that something isn't for you is also knowledge. So is discovering that you liked something for a while and have now had enough.

Perhaps part of what makes this uncomfortable is that adults are often looking for continuity while children are still experimenting.

We see a beginning and wonder where it might lead.

They may simply be finding out what it is like.

What Do We Mean by Perseverance?

The common concern isn't ridiculous: life does contain difficulty. There will be things children deeply want that require effort, frustration, repetition, waiting, failure, starting again. The ability to remain with something when it becomes difficult is valuable.

But that doesn't necessarily mean the way to develop that capacity is to require children to continue activities they no longer want to do.

Because difficulty and unwillingness aren't the same thing.

Children can work astonishingly hard when they are trying to do something that matters to them. They repeat things that don't work. They become frustrated and return. They practice. They ask for help. They tolerate enormous amounts of difficulty because the thing on the other side of that difficulty still belongs to them.

And sometimes they stop.

The important question may not be whether we can get them through the difficult part, but what the difficulty means to them.

Is the child frightened but still longing to participate? Are they frustrated because they haven't yet figured something out? Is the environment wrong for them? Do they dislike the teacher? Are they exhausted? Has the activity changed? Or has their interest simply ended?

Those experiences can look identical from the outside: I don't want to go.

But they don't mean the same thing.

What Is the No Telling Us?

A child who wants to stop may still want what the activity offers. They may want to dance but dread the class. They may want to play an instrument but feel uncomfortable with the teacher. They may love a sport but be frightened by something that happened there. They may want to learn the skill but not in the way it is currently being taught.

In those situations, pushing through and quitting aren't necessarily the only possibilities.

There may be another teacher, another group, another way to participate, or simply a need for more support. Sometimes a child wants to continue but doesn't yet know how to make the situation work for them. What sounds like I don't want to do this may be closer to I don't want to do it like this.

At other times, there isn't a problem waiting to be solved. The child has simply had enough.

That can be harder to accept because there is nothing for us to fix. No obstacle to remove, no fear to help them overcome, no better arrangement that will restore their enthusiasm. Something that once interested them no longer does.

Our own disappointment can make this difficult to recognize. We may have enjoyed watching them do it. We may know how much pleasure it once gave them. We may have invested time, money, transportation, equipment, and energy into making it possible. If they were particularly good at it, we may also be carrying an image of where it could have led.

None of that tells us what the experience is like for them now.

“Sometimes things are fun for a time, and then they’re no longer fun.”
— Becka Koritz

Curiosity becomes important here, not as a strategy for persuading a child to continue, but because the reason they want to stop changes what kind of support makes sense. A child who still wants to do something but is struggling with a particular part of it needs something different from a child who simply isn't interested anymore.

If we decide in advance that quitting is the problem, we may never find out which one we're looking at.

When Our Needs Are Part of the Decision

Children's choices don't happen in isolation, and respecting a child's desire to stop doesn't make the practical realities around that choice disappear.

Classes cost money. Equipment may already have been bought. Someone may have agreed to participate for a certain period of time. A team, ensemble, or other group may be affected when somebody leaves. Parents rearrange work and family schedules to make activities possible, sometimes at considerable effort.

Those things belong in the conversation too.

There is a difference, though, between saying I need you to keep doing this because quitting will make you the kind of person who gives up and saying We paid for four weeks because you wanted to do this, and I can't get that money back. Let's figure out what we can do from here.

The first turns a particular situation into a judgment about a child's character and future. The second acknowledges that one person's choices can affect other people.

This is one reason the question Should I let my child quit? can be too simple. It places the adult in the position of granting or withholding permission, when what is often needed is a conversation about several realities at once.

A child can genuinely not want to continue. A parent can genuinely not be able to absorb the cost of repeatedly abandoning paid activities. A commitment to other people can be real. So can a child's discomfort. None of these has to cancel out the others.

Learning to make choices within relationships includes discovering that our decisions have consequences for people around us. But that is different from being required to continue an unwanted activity so that an adult can teach us a lesson about commitment.

A Break Doesn't Erase What Came Before

One of the assumptions underneath our discomfort with quitting is that stopping somehow wastes what has already happened.

If a child takes piano for a year and stops, we may wonder what the year was for. If they spend months absorbed in chess and then lose interest, all that accumulated knowledge can suddenly look unfinished. We are accustomed to seeing value in progression: beginning leads to competence, competence leads to mastery, and mastery makes the earlier effort worthwhile.

But most of what human beings learn doesn't follow that trajectory.

We encounter things, become interested, learn enough to satisfy something in us, and move on. Sometimes an old interest returns years later. Sometimes it doesn't. The fact that we no longer pursue something doesn't erase what happened while we did.

“We can look at young people as having a very finite timeframe for when they have to master things and find purpose.”
— Sari González

A child who spends a summer learning everything they can about insects doesn't need to become an entomologist for those months to have meant something. A teenager can love theater for three years and never perform again. Someone can learn enough guitar to play a handful of songs and have no desire to become more proficient.

There is an enormous amount of life between never trying something and mastering it.

Yet children are often encouraged to turn interests into skills and skills into achievements. Dabbling can seem unserious. Moving on can look like inconsistency. We can become so interested in where an activity is going that we overlook what it already gave them.

An experience can be complete without becoming permanent.

Perseverance Belongs to the Person Persevering

Perhaps the fear underneath all of this is that if we don't make children continue, they won't discover that they are capable of doing difficult things.

But children don't only encounter difficulty in activities adults choose for them. Difficulty is everywhere.

It appears when they are trying to build something that keeps collapsing, understand a game they care about, repair a friendship, learn a skill they have decided they need, make something look the way they imagined it, save enough money for something they want, or solve a problem nobody else can solve for them.

When the outcome matters enough, people often tolerate extraordinary amounts of frustration.

This doesn't mean children will always persevere when something matters. Sometimes frustration overwhelms them. Sometimes they need encouragement, practical help, company, a different approach, or someone who believes they can do what currently feels impossible.

Support can make the difference between abandoning something in despair and discovering a way through.

But support is not the same as deciding that the destination should matter to them.

There is something fundamentally different about struggling toward something we want and being made to struggle toward something somebody else believes will be good for us. From the outside, both may look like perseverance. From the inside, they are very different experiences.

If our hope is that children develop a capacity to stay with difficult things, it may be worth paying attention to the places where they already do that voluntarily. Their persistence may not appear in the activities adults consider important. It may show up somewhere we aren't measuring at all.

Not Everything Has to Become Something

Children have a long time to encounter the world.

Their interests will change along the way. Something that absorbs them now may lose its appeal, while something they abandoned years earlier may suddenly become interesting again. Some interests will stay with them for decades. Others will be important for a while and then be over.

We cannot know in advance which will be which.

That uncertainty can be uncomfortable when we are responsible for helping children find their way through life. Opportunities aren't infinite, some skills take years to develop, and there are times when a little encouragement can help someone through a difficult stretch they might otherwise have walked away from.

But children are not collections of potential that we have to make sure gets fully developed.

They are people having experiences.

Some of those experiences will lead somewhere. Others will simply have been interesting, pleasurable, difficult, disappointing, illuminating, or fun while they lasted.

Stopping doesn't necessarily mean a child failed to learn perseverance. It doesn't necessarily mean we should have pushed harder. And it doesn't turn the time that came before into wasted time.

A child may stop because something is hard and they need help finding a way through. They may need a break, or something about the situation may need to change. And there will also be times when they are simply done.

An interest doesn't have to become a lifelong pursuit to have been real. A skill doesn't have to be mastered to have been worth learning. An experience doesn't have to continue in order to have mattered.

Children are allowed to find things.

They are also allowed to leave them behind.

Want to Explore More?

If you're rethinking what learning can look like outside school, Un-Skool is our free online portal for parents exploring homeschooling, unschooling, and a different relationship with learning. You'll find free masterclasses and resources, and places to begin depending on where you are in the journey.

→ Explore Un-Skool

If this article has you wondering why certain parenting moments bring up so much urgency, fear, or pressure, our Parenting Archetype Quiz can help you explore some of the patterns underneath those reactions.

→ Take the Parenting Archetype Quiz

You may also enjoy:

→ What Happens When We Treat Children Like Projects?

→ Why Are We Always Preparing Children for Adulthood?

→ How to Stop Comparing Your Child to School

Listen to the Conversation

This article was inspired by our Radical Learning Talks episode When Kids Want to Quit, where we explore why quitting can be so difficult for parents, what may be happening when a child wants to stop, and the fears we can carry about perseverance, commitment, and the future.

Next
Next

Why Do Parents Turn Everything Into a Lesson?